1
When two Russias emerge (Denis Corboy in Khaleej Times) Two Russias are emerging — one seeking
freedom and prosperity, the other focused on patriotism and populism. In the
first, people can travel abroad, buy and sell their homes and keep money
securely in banks. In the other Russia, President Vladimir Putin stifles
dissent, alleges Nato missile defence threats, and seeks to ensnare former
Soviet neighbours in an unequal Eurasian union. A new diplomacy that deals
effectively with both Russias is essential. The first Russia is modernising. In
2011 it had the world’s sixth-largest economy by purchasing power parity. Gross
national income per capita was approximately $20,000, akin to European Union
members Poland and Hungary. Wealthier people often own foreign property or send
children abroad for study.
In some areas
Russia cooperates with the West. It facilitates supplies for Nato forces in
Afghanistan, backs selected sanctions on Iran’s nuclear programme and launches
rockets to the international space station. The second Russia is retrograde. It
is returning to a more statist and authoritarian past, away from ideals of
civil liberties and the rule of law. The Soviet Union is not about to reappear,
but democracy-building groups are under assault, dissidents are thrown into
psychiatric hospitals and justice is politically rigged. Russia ranks 142 out
of 179 countries in the Press Freedom Index compiled by Reporters Without
Borders.
Internationally,
Russia struggles to retain its identity as a great power, even though it is
being eclipsed by more dynamic areas of the world such as East Asia. But
stubborn support for the Assad regime in Syria has tarnished the prestige of
Russia, and intimidation of neighbours leaves it without friends or allies.
Retrograde
Russia can be its own worst enemy. Dual track diplomacy, embodying pragmatic
but principled approaches, would foster cooperation with Russia on common
interests while lifting the spirits of those who seek democracy and respect for
human rights.
2
One billion rising – Like a feminist tsunami (Jane Martinson in The Guardian) Since
Eve Ensler launched the One Billion Rising campaign to end violence against
women she has been repeatedly asked: is it a dance movement or overtly
political? Just a few weeks before 14 February, the date that Ensler, activist
and author of The Vagina Monologues, designated the "day to rise",
she says: "I've never seen anything like it in my lifetime."
One
in three women around the world are subject to violence at some point in their
life, a statistic that prompted Ensler, who wrote the Monologues in 1996, to
set up One Billion Rising. With such violence encompassing domestic abuse, gang
rape, female genital mutilation and war, it is perhaps unsurprising that the
campaign has taken on a different hue in each of the 190 countries where events
to mark 14 February are planned. "It is something that has gone across
class, social group and religion. It's like a huge feminist tsunami," she
said in Paris.
Ensler says a combination of social media and the world's grassroots feminist movements have driven the way the campaign has taken off globally. In south Asia for three weeks over Christmas, she was struck by how much the horror over the gang rape of the 23-year-old medical student Jyoti Singh in Delhi had given impetus to the campaign. "In India, One Billion Rising is at the centre of the biggest breakthrough in sexual violence ever seen," she says.
3 Pakistan’s other problem (Bruce Stokes on BBC) Pakistan is a country beset with
political difficulties, but they could be of secondary importance to its
economic woes. While much attention has been devoted to the dramatic Supreme
Court move to order the arrest of Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf on charges
of corruption and recent large-scale protests led by populist cleric Tahirul
Qadri to demand the resignation of the government ahead of elections due in
May, the country's financial difficulties have been overlooked.
Likewise recent
deadly militant bombings have also distracted attention, as have skirmishes
with India on the Line of Control (LoC) that divides the disputed Kashmir
region. These headline-grabbing events have not only served to obscure the
profound economic challenges facing Pakistani society but in many cases have
also nurtured and aggravated them.
The truth is
that the Pakistani people are deeply troubled by the plight of their economy
and their own economic prospects. With the government likely to ask the
International Monetary Fund this year for a new aid package, the nation's
economic plight may soon become topic number one in the global discussion about
Pakistan's future. Economic growth over the past four years, after adjustment
for inflation, averaged 2.9% annually, and is projected to be only 3.2% in
2012-13. That, says the IMF, is not sufficient to achieve significant
improvement in living standards and to absorb the rising labour force.