1 An uphill climb for millennials (Caroline Porter in The Wall Street Journal) The on-ramp to adulthood is delayed and harder to reach for young people today, a reality that is changing the country's society and economy, according to a new report. More demanding job requirements, coupled with the pressures of the recession, have delayed the transition to adulthood for young people in the past decade and earned them the title of "the new lost generation," according to the report from the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
Through analyzing about three decades of census data—from 1980 to 2012—the study found that on average, young workers are now 30 years old when they first earn a median-wage income of about $42,000, a marker of financial independence, up from 26 years old in 1980. The labor-force participation rate for young people last year declined to its lowest point in about 40 years, according to the report.
For young people, the delayed entry into the world of work is partly a reflection of the recent recession, but it is also driven by long-term trends, including more jobs that require advanced skills and fewer high-paying factory jobs that required little more than a high-school diploma, the report found. The "new knowledge economy" has spawned more internships and bite-size credentials as a result.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303643304579105450145516622.html?mod=trending_now_5
2 Driving the next era of sustainable business (John Brock in The Guardian) When the global financial crisis hit, there was significant speculation that organisations would move away from investment in sustainability. In fact, companies have maintained – or even grown – their commitments. However, the success and sophistication with which companies are adopting sustainability strategies vary widely.
In a
research that explores the role that innovation, collaboration and technology
play in implementing sustainability strategies, more than 330 senior executives
across Europe were asked about their experiences when setting and pursuing
sustainability objectives. It's clear from the survey that while some make
strong links between innovation, competitiveness and sustainability – by
offering more sustainable products (48%) or investing in renewable energy (33%)
– others are still trying to gain endorsement from the top and a clear view of
how to embed sustainability in their business.
We're
facing dwindling natural resources and potentially 3 billion new middle-class
consumers by 2030. Tried and tested solutions won't work anymore, so we need to
accelerate the pace of change and embrace disruptive new business models to
drive breakthroughs in the next era of sustainable business. Ten years ago, who
would have thought we'd be renting our cars by the hour?
Alongside
innovation and collaboration, technology will continue to be important in
driving sustainability plans forward. According to the survey, 58% of
businesses are using technology to develop more sustainable business models,
and 54% are using social or mobile technologies to engage with their customers.
Companies'
approaches to sustainability have clearly matured, and greater opportunities
now exist to harness the transformative power of external partnerships,
innovation, technology and senior leadership. We can't get there on our own. It
will be the companies that recognise this and use it to their competitive
advantage that will be leading the way over the next 20 years.
http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/what-drive-next-era-sustainable-development
3 Toshiba axes 3,000 jobs (BBC) Japanese electronics firm
Toshiba has said it will halve the number of staff in its TV division to 3,000
as it looks to revamp the unit's operations. The changes will also see the firm
close two of its three overseas TV manufacturing facilities. Toshiba said it
would focus on emerging markets including Asia and Africa, and end sales in
"unprofitable regions".
Toshiba,
like other Japanese TV makers, has been hit by slowing demand, falling prices
and increased competition. The company's digital products division, which
includes TV manufacturing, saw its losses widen to 16.3bn yen ($166m), in the
financial year to 31 March, compared with a loss of 3.3bn yen a year earlier.
4 Apple is most valuable brand (Stuart Elliott in
The New York Times) Apple is the new most valuable brand in the world,
according to an annual report from Interbrand, a corporate identity and brand
consulting company owned by the Omnicom Group that has been compiling what it
calls the Best Global Brands report since 2000. The previous No. 1 brand, Coca-Cola,
fell to No. 3.
Not only has Apple replaced Coca-Cola as first among
the 100 most valuable brands based on criteria that include financial
performance, this is the first time that the soft drink known for slogans like
“It’s the real thing” has not been No. 1. The 2013 report begins: “Every so
often, a company changes our lives, not just with its products, but with its
ethos. This is why, following Coca-Cola’s 13-year run at the top of Best Global
Brands, Interbrand has a new No. 1 — Apple.”
The report estimates the value of the Apple brand at
$98.3 billion, up 28 percent from the 2012 report. The value of the Coca-Cola
brand also rose, by 2 percent to $79.2 billion, but that was not sufficient to
give Coca-Cola a 14th year as Interbrand’s most valuable brand. A spokesman
said, “Coca-Cola is an efficient, outstanding brand marketer, no doubt about
it,” but Apple and other leading technology brands have become “very much the
poster child of the marketing community.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/30/business/media/apple-passes-coca-cola-as-most-valuable-brand.html?ref=media&_r=0
It is embarrassing to watch the last shards of credibility crumble around a prime minister who has been in office for nearly a decade. His visit to the White House this week has all the warmth of a desultory retirement dinner financed by a quick whip-around. Is Dr Manmohan Singh a stoic? To take punishment from the Opposition is part of the give and take of democratic politics, but to accept such dismissive barbs from one’s own colleagues requires a temperament that is not easy to decipher.
There is no government left. What we have instead is a desultory squabble in which no minister can be sure of where he stands, or where he should stand, on any issue. A technical structure will hold office, while Congress continues to hope that some miracle between now and next March will prevent an electoral meltdown. Miracles need saints, and there are no saints in politics.
http://khaleejtimes.com/kt-article-display-1.asp?xfile=data/opinion/2013/September/opinion_September50.xml§ion=opinion
No comments:
Post a Comment