1 ECB emergency funding saves Greek banking collapse
(Larry Elliott in The Guardian) The European Central Bank provided just enough
support on Friday to stave off the collapse of the Greek banking system as
political and financial pressure was piled on Athens before a crisis summit of
eurozone leaders on Monday.
With more than €1bn leaving Greek banks on Friday
alone, the ECB provided €1.8bn in emergency funding to keep the system
operating over the weekend. The ECB’s tough line came as a succession of
European politicians demanded the Greek government of Alexis Tsipras come up
with proposals that would prevent Greece’s default and its possible exit from
the single currency.
Far from buckling, the Greek prime minister put on a
show of defiance during a visit to Russia, where he made a pitch for support
from Vladimir Putin. “We are ready to go to new seas to reach new safe ports,”
Tsipras said. Russia’s deputy prime minister Arkady Dvorkovich had hinted that
Russia would consider a loan to Greece.
Failure to end the stalemate between Greece and its
creditors at a meeting of eurozone finance ministers on Thursday led to fresh
Greek deposit withdrawals, bringing the total for the week to €4.2bn. The
British chancellor, George Osborne, said Tsipras should do a deal before it was
too late, and that Europe should start preparing for the worst.
2 Millennials aren’t as different as companies think
(Kia Croom in San Francisco Chronicle) Millennial workers are misunderstood,
according to SAP’s recently released Workforce2020 study. The tech company
surveyed 2,700 executives and 2,700 employees in 27 countries. Half of employees
surveyed were millennials. The study found similarities between millennial and
non-millennial workers.
“We learned millennials are not as different as we
think they are,” said Karie Willyerd, Workplace Futurist at SAP. For example,
myth number one: millennials care more than non-millennials about making a
positive difference in the world through work. According to the study,
one-fifth of millennials and non-Millennials alike cite “making a difference”
as important to their job satisfaction.
Myth number two: Achieving work life balance is more
important to millennials. Survey data indicates 31 percent of non-Millennials
say work life balance important to their job satisfaction, vs. 29 percent of
millennials. Myth number three: Meeting income goals is less important to
millennials as long as they are learning and growing. Research indicates
millennials prioritize meeting career goals and income goals, followed
distantly by learning and growing.
When it comes to job satisfaction, millennials
prioritize meeting career goals (35 percent), meeting income goals (32
percent), and meeting goals for advancement (29 percent). Non-millennials
prioritize corporate values that match their own (30 percent), achieving
work/life balance (31 percent), and meeting income goals (30 percent).
However, the study suggests millennials and non-millennials
differ in terms of how they need to be managed, how they view professional
development and how they like to receive feedback from their supervisors. Nearly
one-third of millennials say they expect more feedback on their performance
than they currently receive—and they want it more often than non-millennials.
More than two-thirds of millennials want informal
feedback from their managers at least monthly, whereas less than half of
non-millennials expect feedback that often. The non-millennials are perfectly
content with the routine 1-2 performance evaluations per year. They want to do
their job and be left alone.
3 Working mothers who make it all work (Laura
Vanderkam in The Wall Street Journal) Of all the truisms about work and life
out there, the most widely accepted may be this: Any woman who tries to combine
a high-powered career and a family is going to be one frazzled, sleep-deprived
mess.
First, while these women certainly focus on being
efficient during the hours they work, the long hours allegedly required by big
jobs may be somewhat exaggerated. In my study of women earning six figures,
they averaged 44 hours of work a week. No one logged more than 70. To be sure,
my sample is small and unscientific, and 80-hour weeks do happen—but they may
not be as common as people think.
Second, women who did work long hours often had a
good dose of autonomy and flexibility in their big jobs. Close to half of the
women in my study worked what I call a “split shift.” They left work at a
reasonable hour, spent time with family in the evening, then did more work at
night after the kids went to bed.
Finally, women with big jobs earn enough to buy
balance, in obvious and less obvious ways. Women in my study spent an average
of 10 hours a week on housework and errands; the typical employed American
mother spends about 19. Women at the top ordered what they could online, hired
cleaning services and had household help to cook family meals. Women with big
jobs, in short, have more autonomy and resources than women who earn less,
which allows them to have more balanced lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment